Careers & Jobs
Real Estate & Rentals
Full MSN Index
Top 100 will leave some players disappointed
Kyle Rudolph (Kyle Terada/USA TODAY)
Posted Jun 14, 2013
With only 20 spots remaining, some deserving players will be disappointed they didn’t make the top-100 list for 2013.
As part of its mid-summer
, the NFL Network has completed 80 percent of its Top 100 Players of 2013. In a countdown that actually had a pre-show the week of the 2013 draft, it continues to drone on interminably – like a team-by-team “32-in-32” segment or a Mount (or Mt.) Rushmore of every team that effectively filled up two weeks-plus of content.
The sad thing about the countdown, other than it has taken nine weeks and has become a tad more anticlimactic every week despite being subject to scorn and ridicule, is that it becomes a slap in the face of NFL players in some respects. They don’t all have college degrees – they were in college for a reason – but they can do the math.
The NFL Network released Nos. 30-21 of its list of the 100 most influential players of 2013. That leaves 20. For weeks, players with NFL-sized egos have hoped to see their names … at some point. Nobody wanted to hear their name at Nos. 100-91. But the longer their names haven’t come up, the more they may be getting a little salty. Most have come to the conclusion that they aren’t showing up.
Say what you want about the list, but for our money, we would take
ever day – and twice on Sundays. We would take
– the only center on the list. We would take
or Charles Woodson (who was ironically listed as a cornerback on the list, a position he hasn’t played in some time).
To date, the list has included 15 wide receivers, 12 linebackers, eight running backs, cornerbacks and tight ends, seven quarterbacks and defensive ends, five defensive tackles, four offensive tackles and safeties, and one guard and center. There are only 20 left.
The crack Viking Update I-Team investigators got on the job and, as a crack team can do, reversed engineered the list and these are their findings – there are going to be a couple guys who won’t be happy.
Our team donned their lab coats and came away with the following: There are 17 players who, beyond any doubt have to be on the list. From the boys in the lab coats, those 17 players are, in the most likely order, as follows:
What’s good about the deconstruction is that the staff eliminated the list from 20 down to three. No argument can be made that has a basis in reality that can deny any of the players on this list. They’re on it. Much like a political team doing a body count of representation, there are only three spots legitimately up for inclusion.
But who gets those three spots? There are several players that have expected to see their names.
gave up his hope the Thursday after the draft – if he wasn’t on, what kicker would be? Going 10-for-10 on field goals of 50 yards or longer would make him the lone kicker on the list if there was going to be one.
But, the players who have yet to be named are the ones that are going to be the most interesting. An argument can be made for seven players, although cornerbacks
are likely to be very disappointed that they weren’t included and a safety like Woodson is listed as a cornerback.
Who doesn’t make the list? The five players with a legitimate argument are two quarterbacks (
), one running back (
), one wide receiver (
) and one offensive tackle (
With a gun to the head, the argument can be made that you can’t keep the defending Super Bowl winning quarterback from being on the list. Flacco makes it.
Johnson has been a stud with Houston since the offense was in its infancy and he is still the head-and-shoulders go-to receiver. You can’t put both
on the team and not put Andre 3000.
For No. 20? Clady seems like a safe choice. Romo and Charles will be extremely upset that they’re viewed so minimally, but that’s the beauty of lists that take months to play out. There are going to be hurt feelings. There already have been by those players who came to the realization that they weren’t going to be on the list.
John Holler has been writing about the Vikings for more than a decade for
Viking Update on Twitter
and discuss this topic on our
. To become a subscriber to the Viking Update web site or magazine,
Rhodes ready for the physical play
Jun 14, 2013
NFL tightens security with bag restrictions
Jun 14, 2013
PHOTO GALLERY: Best of OTAs
Jun 14, 2013
Subscribe today and get a full year of
Viking Update Magazine
with an annual Total Access Pass.
Free Email Newsletter
Don't miss any news or features from VikingUpdate.com. Subscribe to our newsletter to have our newest articles emailed to you on a daily or weekly basis.
Click here for a
list of all Team Newsletters
Add Topics to My HotList
Get free email alerts with news about your favorite topics. Click link to add to
Football > Minnesota
View My HotList
Copyright © 2014 Scout.com.
All rights reserved.
Terms of Service
Junior College Football
Advertise on MSN
About our ads
© 2014 Microsoft